Music Business – Hindsight 20/20

July 18, 2009 at 7:23 am | In Marketing, Media Business, Music Business | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

EMI Music CEO Elio Leoni-Sceti has been recently quoted saying:

Looking at the music industry, which has become something of a bellwether for other media businesses, we have a situation where seventy percent of music consumption is digital and yet only about twenty percent of music company revenues are derived from digital.  Music is in demand and the demand is growing all the time, but we’ve clearly lost touch with our consumers.

Not to ‘Monday Morning Quarterback’ too much, but I would argue that in order to lose touch with your consumers, you actually have to be in touch to begin with and that has never been the case.  Consumers are ’song’ driven and have been since the beginning of radio, but it was always the format that restricted consumption.  From vinyl, to 8-track, to cassette, to CD there were always natural barriers in place to restrict unauthorized distribution.  While those restrictions were in place, artists were bloating their records with filler and labels were increasing their profits, compounding consumer frustration.  The Music Industry can claim ‘bellwether’ status all they want, but to miss the potential of the Internet was just ignorant, filing copyright infringement suits against your consumers was, and is, counterproductive, developing DRM technology was wasteful and futile, and to think consumers wouldn’t gravitate back to single consumption if given the opportunity is just evidence that a few key people had their head stuck in the sand.  It was a nice effort, but it was all ‘reactive’.  Nothing was proactive.  Nobody thought to look ahead.  Nobody thought to plan ahead, and for that, let’s take a moment and pause for the 7 Ps:

Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance

So…In order to leave you with something other than complaints about the obvious, here are a few things I’ve come up with that I would have done differently:

  • Embrace and build P2P in an effort to monetize, cross-market, gather consumer data, and track consumer behavior
  • Demand variable track pricing from day 1 in order to generate revenue with regard to demand
  • Raise the ‘Standard’ track price
  • Build Label-Owned and Label-Merchandised online music destination equipped to compete
  • Empower a 3rd party vendor where competing labels have an equity stake
  • Bring Booking, Publishing, and Management, Distribution, and Merch In-House where possible
  • Develop a modular and streamlined way of delivering digital product
  • Monetize every Artist website and begin a relationship with the consumer at a transactional level
  • Abandon all DRM efforts
  • Invest heavily in a more positive, artist-driven, public re-education campaign around Intellectual Property and Fair Use
  • Aggressively restructure and reorganize
  • Simplify physical product pricing, promotion, and distribution

You may agree or disagree with many of these, but I encourage you to leave your own ideas in the comments section, especially if you believe I’ve left a gaping hole somewhere.  Not to necessarily ‘blamestorm’, but to better understand where we came from and what we have come through in order to better prepare ourselves for the future.  Also, if you want to a consistently good read from a guy who really appreciates the history of the Music Business and music in general, subscribe to the Clore Chronicles.

Moving on though, I think the real challenge is where we go from here.  Leoni-Sceti’s comments above regarding digital consumption versus revenue is a huge disconnect and a code that isn’t easily cracked.  It makes it even more difficult to dig out given the macroeconomic constraints present in today’s US economy.  From my perspective, I still don’t think we are proactive enough.  I still don’t think we are aggressive enough.  So many people are just clinging to their jobs and trying to manage their daily duties, previously handled by multiple people.  I’m not sure who’s looking ahead anymore.  Godin and Anderson are two of my favorite idea guys, but they aren’t the decision makers here.  To make matters worse, I don’t think the future of the business is going to be as glaringly obvious as before.  In the last year, we’ve watched Myspace rise and fall, Facebook gravitate towards women over 55, and Twitter rise to the top overnight in a manner that screams ‘fad’.  We don’t have time for a slow build formula, technology, model, or destination, but that’s what instills trust, relationships, and ultimately transactions.

To sum it up:

The Music Industry can’t afford people spending time looking ahead, but then again…they can’t afford not too

Music: Its Very Own Loss Leader

June 23, 2009 at 1:07 am | In Marketing, Music Business | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Consumers want songs.  There are exceptions when it comes to artists like Pink Floyd, but the main reason that consumers bought albums for years is because they had to.  It was the only way to get the song they wanted and there were no easy technological workarounds.  The music industry is fooling itself if it thinks the consumer will ever go back to buying albums or that bundling records up as digital Album Only purchases will actually help.

Pandora’s box has been opened.

It was essentially a race to zero.  The labels began streaming early on.  They could get around publishing fees that way and still expose their artists.  Then there was the “Free Download”, as if that was going to curb the appetite for P2P use.  After the free download, it was the free EP because intuition, or insecurity rather,  said that “One song just wasn’t enough,” and now we have successfully moved to giving away the full album.  From Radiohead to Nine Inch Nails, to Coldplay, and beyond.  These high profile stunts have trained consumers to expect free or at least deep discounted products and to bypass anything at full price.  Each of these stunts were loss leaders for tickets, merch, or future premium products which directly benefited those artists.  The problem is that most labels don’t benefit from tickets, merch, or in some cases premium products.  They only own the content so treating it like a loss leader is counterproductive.

When you go to Wal-mart to grab a deep discounted CD (or loss leader), Wal-mart is banking on you buying a plunger and a toothbrush before you leave.  When you buy an album at a deep discount, the label hopes that you will tell your friends so they go buy it, pack mom’s minivan with friends headed to the show where you all come home wearing the t-shirt.

The reality is that you won’t tell your friends, you’ll just burn them a copy, and the label won’t make a dime off of the ticket sales or merch.  The reality is that you can’t be your own loss leader.  It’s either time for the labels to successfully invest in plungers and toothbrushes (figuratively speaking), or time for management and booking agencies to begin participating in recording costs.  In the meantime, the labels need to be doing everything they can to stop devaluing their lifeline – recorded music.

Edited Keynote – Bad News for Music Marketers

March 25, 2009 at 4:21 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Some insight from the consumer research front.

Web 2.0 New Marketing 4Ps

November 6, 2008 at 1:53 am | In Marketing, Music Business | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Just Passing this Along.  Another Wikidiscovery

Wikipedia Link

1.  Personalization:  Consumer customization of the product or service.  Opportunities expand and evolve with technology.

2.  Participation:  Consumer plays a role in the direction of the brand, product, service and is a by-product of the democratization of information.

3.  Peer-to-Peer:  “Active Consumer Communities” replacing “Passive Consumer Bases”.

4.  Predictive Modeling – Implementing algorithms that limit risk, maximize potential, and eliminate known problems.

Quote – Digital Media Digest

July 20, 2008 at 7:09 pm | In ...And I Quote | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

“There will always be Freeloaders, but it is the labels’ prerogative and responsibility to get the music to the fans without encouraging any illegal activity.”

Competing with Free

July 20, 2008 at 7:04 pm | In Music Business | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Record Labels CAN Compete with FREE!

1. Convenience: All P2P users suffer from one problem. If one of them doesn’t have it, then none of them have it.  The file has to remain active through the entire download process. It only takes a few failed attempts for the 99cent download to become appealing and if iTunes has it, they have it 24/7 for a price you can count on. Convenience is the first step, but it cannot succeed alone.

2. Value: Bundling and limited time price promotions take the sting out of paying for downloads. Give them something they can’t get on P2P or that’s at least nearly impossible to find. There are more options than ever for those interested in bundling physical and digital formats, merch, swag, etc. Bundle value with convenience, and you now have a word of mouth marketing campaign. Value is subjective and can be a great resource, but it cannot succeed alone.

3. Spoofing: Ever boot up your limewire, download your favorite track and then play it, only to find out that it’s not what you wanted. Spoof the hi octane audio…the stuff people want, because that’s what they are going to be looking for first. If you can spoof those quick enough and cause enough confusion and frustration, you will soon have a real customer. Spoofing is valuable but it cannot and will never succeed alone.

4. Mole Control: Just to clarify – THE CD IS A DIGITAL FORMAT. Yes, you can hold it in your hand, but for some reason, that fact alone is the most dangerous and most fatal misconception. The CD is not only a digital format…it’s the label’s worst nightmare and the only people who don’t fully understand it’s distructive power are the labels. It has superb quality, It can be duplicated, it can be uploaded, and it can be shared without degradation to the nth degree. I’m not saying the labels should protect the CD, I’m saying they should stop using it until after the release date. Promote the record digitally through secure channels, use streaming audio where possible, vet accounts and representatives that require the special treatment of a CD, and protect your assets from leaks. Mole control can be effective, but it cannot succeed alone.

5. Snippits: a 30 second sample will tease but not satisfy, and guess what…any portion of a song will tease but not satisfy. There’s something about the end of a song that people want to hear. Perhaps it’s needing to feel complete. The catch is that people don’t even want snippets for free. They’ll listen a few times, but ultimately they are going to want the entire thing and that’s where convenience comes in. 30 seconds is a trend that was solidified by Apple…it’s not the golden rule and the labels should use snippets instead of full songs everywhere possible before a release date. They should supply links to the content as soon as it’s available for sale from the snippets. Customers and fans alike will be willing to surf to your website and stream all day long until they are so satisfied that find no reason to buy. Snippets keep them hungry. Snippets excite and frustrate, but Snippets cannot succeed alone.

6. The Combo – (SUCCESS): You only have so many hours in a day and you are short staffed at best. How do you maximize your ability to compete with Free? Pick 3 of the top 5 (any 3) and you will be well on your way.

Say you use snippits, spoofing, and convenience. You have raised the demand for your artists while raising awareness and making value obsolete, you have created mass confusion in the Free world regardless of any leaks from your promotional engine, and you have made it easy for anyone who hears a snippet to buy the song.

Say you use Value, Mole Control, and Convenience. By default, you have created a word of mouth campaign, while limiting the chances that P2P will be able to compete with you on Release Day which will beg the question of every freeloader out there, “Is it really worth the time and effort it would take to steal”

New Music Landscape – Good, Bad or Depends?

June 17, 2008 at 10:21 pm | In Music Business | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

We all know the music industry landscape is changing. For better or for worse? Depends on who you ask, of course.

Ask the Fans?

The fans have it better than ever. There’s a multitude of free music outlets or quasi-free music outlets like the following, that are willing to eat the cost or risk involved to aggressively pursue customer acquisition.

Even the A La Carte storefronts like iTunes are giving away tens of thousands of downloads a week on the homepage and various genre pages in order lure in the fans under the ruse of music discovery. For some, like Lala, the price of admission is an email address; for Myspace, the price you pay is having to endure ridiculous advertising and a cluster of irritating templates because no one really knows how to program a myspace page and even the ones who do steer far away from the format; with iTunes, it’s upsell: A movie rental, A radio single, The latest Album or Music Video, and the latest have-to-have early release.

Ask the Artists?

The Artists have new distribution channels opened up to them on a daily basis. They can interact directly with their fans from their mobile phones. They can immediately upload footage from the road to their web real-estate. They can manage their own album sales through major vendors like iTunes via companies like CDBaby or TuneCore. They can even sell directly to their fans from their social network of choice (iMeem, Myspace, etc.).

Ask the Digital Retailers?

Of those mentioned above, it’s hard to say what the digital retailers would say about the new landscape other than the fact that opportunity is rampant and there is a ton of fight left in all of the major digital retailers. Even though iTunes just crossed their 5 Billion Song benchmark and it would be easy to say that Apple has seen windfall profits because of it, let’s back-step for a few seconds. iTunes is the only profitable, legitimate music retailer that exists right now and even while controlling roughly 90% of the market-share, they still seem to be struggling to make a profit at all. Who’s really making the profits? Who would say that the music industry has benefited them the most? The Credit Card Companies. Let’s run the numbers:

  • Single Song Download – $0.99
  • Label Wholesale Rate – 68 to 72 Percent
  • iTunes Estimated Revenue/Track – $0.29
  • Credit Card Company – 15 cents/transaction + 2 to 3 percent
  • iTunes Estimated Net Income/track – $0.11

11 cents/track is still Topline. Even with crafty accounting, and careful management of micro payments, it’s still not going to be much more than that and they haven’t paid the Label Relations staff, the Programmers, the IT team, the suits, or the electric bills…much less travel expenses and other necessary expenditures. It’s common knowledge that Apple makes it’s money on the hardware (the iPod), but what about companies like Napster, Passalong, Amazon, or Rhapsody who don’t have a successful hardware device and haven’t sold 5 Billion songs. Try to make a successful business from that. In spite of the challenges, it seems that all the players are still willing to duke it out until the very last blow. A few casualties of war, like SonyConnect, have already been taken to their grave, but the rest are still rounding up funding from somewhere and continue to press on.

Ask the Physical CD Retail Stores?

Ask them how in the world they plan on selling CDs that aren’t on the shelf. It only takes one consumer, one time to go into a store an come out empty handed before iTunes starts to look really good (especially considering gas prices). It’s a vicious cycle, where lack of innovation in a timely manner has caused much pain for the retailers and for the labels over the past 2 or 3 years. Protectionism has brought them nothing but further failures and a full recovery is out of the question at this point. Physical CD Sales are down 11% from this time last year and Digital is up 33%. Digital never could offset the drop of physical product and now that Digital Product gains are slowing down it’s looking more an more like the Industry as a whole will plateau at a point that is so much lower than ever expected…and this brings us to the labels…

Ask the Labels?

The labels have already suffered major blows to the headcount in 2008 and it doesn’t seem like the hemorrhaging will stop anytime soon. EMI is looking toward more shrinkage by the end of 2008, BMG wants out the Music Industry all of a sudden, and Sony, Universal, and Warner sure haven’t had it easy. In some ways, the loss of headcount is not necessarily bad. The labels have to trim the fat when and where necessary, and Digital Departments are able to pull in more revenue from more accounts with less people manning the ship, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they shouldn’t ramp up the headcount in those areas, Most labels are struggling with quantifying the need and the value of Digital Employees. How many do you need? How effective are they? How much revenue or promotional value is coming from them versus the value being brought in by the Long Tail?  These are all valid concerns coming from the suits but the ones who are willing to invest the money right now will reap what they sow in the future when it comes to brand recognition, impact of catalog, and marketshare.

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.