Music Business – Hindsight 20/20
July 18, 2009 at 7:23 am | In Marketing, Media Business, Music Business | 1 CommentTags: 8-track, albums, Amazon, Cassette, CDs, Chris Anderson, Clore Chronicles, consumers, cross-marketing, digital, Direct to Consumer, distribution, download, Elio Leoni-Sceti, Email Marketing, EMI, facebook, fair use, Future, History, iTunes, labels, Marketing, Merch Intellectual Property, Music, Music Business, myspace, p2p, Pricing, Promotion, Relational Marketing, Seth Godin, Tracks, twitter, Vinyl
EMI Music CEO Elio Leoni-Sceti has been recently quoted saying:
Looking at the music industry, which has become something of a bellwether for other media businesses, we have a situation where seventy percent of music consumption is digital and yet only about twenty percent of music company revenues are derived from digital. Music is in demand and the demand is growing all the time, but we’ve clearly lost touch with our consumers.
Not to ‘Monday Morning Quarterback’ too much, but I would argue that in order to lose touch with your consumers, you actually have to be in touch to begin with and that has never been the case. Consumers are ’song’ driven and have been since the beginning of radio, but it was always the format that restricted consumption. From vinyl, to 8-track, to cassette, to CD there were always natural barriers in place to restrict unauthorized distribution. While those restrictions were in place, artists were bloating their records with filler and labels were increasing their profits, compounding consumer frustration. The Music Industry can claim ‘bellwether’ status all they want, but to miss the potential of the Internet was just ignorant, filing copyright infringement suits against your consumers was, and is, counterproductive, developing DRM technology was wasteful and futile, and to think consumers wouldn’t gravitate back to single consumption if given the opportunity is just evidence that a few key people had their head stuck in the sand. It was a nice effort, but it was all ‘reactive’. Nothing was proactive. Nobody thought to look ahead. Nobody thought to plan ahead, and for that, let’s take a moment and pause for the 7 Ps:
Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance
So…In order to leave you with something other than complaints about the obvious, here are a few things I’ve come up with that I would have done differently:
- Embrace and build P2P in an effort to monetize, cross-market, gather consumer data, and track consumer behavior
- Demand variable track pricing from day 1 in order to generate revenue with regard to demand
- Raise the ‘Standard’ track price
- Build Label-Owned and Label-Merchandised online music destination equipped to compete
- Empower a 3rd party vendor where competing labels have an equity stake
- Bring Booking, Publishing, and Management, Distribution, and Merch In-House where possible
- Develop a modular and streamlined way of delivering digital product
- Monetize every Artist website and begin a relationship with the consumer at a transactional level
- Abandon all DRM efforts
- Invest heavily in a more positive, artist-driven, public re-education campaign around Intellectual Property and Fair Use
- Aggressively restructure and reorganize
- Simplify physical product pricing, promotion, and distribution
You may agree or disagree with many of these, but I encourage you to leave your own ideas in the comments section, especially if you believe I’ve left a gaping hole somewhere. Not to necessarily ‘blamestorm’, but to better understand where we came from and what we have come through in order to better prepare ourselves for the future. Also, if you want to a consistently good read from a guy who really appreciates the history of the Music Business and music in general, subscribe to the Clore Chronicles.
Moving on though, I think the real challenge is where we go from here. Leoni-Sceti’s comments above regarding digital consumption versus revenue is a huge disconnect and a code that isn’t easily cracked. It makes it even more difficult to dig out given the macroeconomic constraints present in today’s US economy. From my perspective, I still don’t think we are proactive enough. I still don’t think we are aggressive enough. So many people are just clinging to their jobs and trying to manage their daily duties, previously handled by multiple people. I’m not sure who’s looking ahead anymore. Godin and Anderson are two of my favorite idea guys, but they aren’t the decision makers here. To make matters worse, I don’t think the future of the business is going to be as glaringly obvious as before. In the last year, we’ve watched Myspace rise and fall, Facebook gravitate towards women over 55, and Twitter rise to the top overnight in a manner that screams ‘fad’. We don’t have time for a slow build formula, technology, model, or destination, but that’s what instills trust, relationships, and ultimately transactions.
To sum it up:
The Music Industry can’t afford people spending time looking ahead, but then again…they can’t afford not too
Music: Its Very Own Loss Leader
June 23, 2009 at 1:07 am | In Marketing, Music Business | Leave a CommentTags: Album, CD, deep discount, digital, EP, Free Download, Loss Leader, Media, merch, Music, p2p, tickets, Wal-mart
Consumers want songs. There are exceptions when it comes to artists like Pink Floyd, but the main reason that consumers bought albums for years is because they had to. It was the only way to get the song they wanted and there were no easy technological workarounds. The music industry is fooling itself if it thinks the consumer will ever go back to buying albums or that bundling records up as digital Album Only purchases will actually help.
Pandora’s box has been opened.
It was essentially a race to zero. The labels began streaming early on. They could get around publishing fees that way and still expose their artists. Then there was the “Free Download”, as if that was going to curb the appetite for P2P use. After the free download, it was the free EP because intuition, or insecurity rather, said that “One song just wasn’t enough,” and now we have successfully moved to giving away the full album. From Radiohead to Nine Inch Nails, to Coldplay, and beyond. These high profile stunts have trained consumers to expect free or at least deep discounted products and to bypass anything at full price. Each of these stunts were loss leaders for tickets, merch, or future premium products which directly benefited those artists. The problem is that most labels don’t benefit from tickets, merch, or in some cases premium products. They only own the content so treating it like a loss leader is counterproductive.
When you go to Wal-mart to grab a deep discounted CD (or loss leader), Wal-mart is banking on you buying a plunger and a toothbrush before you leave. When you buy an album at a deep discount, the label hopes that you will tell your friends so they go buy it, pack mom’s minivan with friends headed to the show where you all come home wearing the t-shirt.
The reality is that you won’t tell your friends, you’ll just burn them a copy, and the label won’t make a dime off of the ticket sales or merch. The reality is that you can’t be your own loss leader. It’s either time for the labels to successfully invest in plungers and toothbrushes (figuratively speaking), or time for management and booking agencies to begin participating in recording costs. In the meantime, the labels need to be doing everything they can to stop devaluing their lifeline – recorded music.
The Long Tail in Question
May 25, 2009 at 5:00 am | In Marketing, Music Business | 1 CommentTags: Amazon, audio, Catalog, CDBaby, Chris Anderson, consumers, Content, Demand, digital, Digital Media Digest, distribution, Economics, Harvard, internet, iTunes, label, long tail, Music, Online, Project Studio, Record Labels, Supply, The Long Tail, Tunecore
Chris Anderson’s Long Tail Theory is under scrutiny, and both sides have reason to claim victory. I’d be interested in Chris running his numbers again with data from iTunes and AmazonMP3. If I had to guess, his 98% rule is overstated at best. Keep in mind he was doing his research on data from 2004, which is way too early to develop a trend rule that will stand the test of time. Regardless, after analyzing the data that I do have access to, I fully believe in the value of the “tail”, but I’ve come up with a series of x-factors that I believe were underestimated, ultimately leading to a 98% rule in question, and Long Tail under the microscope.
- Project Studio Proliferation in the 90s:
- Creative and Financial filters were destroyed.
- Music creation became affordable…not just consumption.
- Supply increased exponentially.
- Digital Content Delivery Services:
- The Internet:
- Destroyed traditional distribution filters
- Introduced a retail environment absent of scarcity.
- Distribution products without demand became possible.
- Consumers given access to their niche
- The Majors realize value in Digital Distribution:
- Released a flood of product with little or diminishing demand into the market. For example, out-of-print titles could be resurrected without the traditional costs of manufacturing, stocking, and distribution.
- Streamline processes to make extend their “tail”.
I believe we will hit what I call a “Ground Zero” with audio content by 2010. The Majors will have completed their catalog delivery and any pent up product still looking for distribution will have found it’s way into the digital marketplace. By then, who knows what new technologies will be available or what challenges lie ahead. I appreciate Anderson’s work in trendspotting and hope, for the sake of us all working in the industry, he will continue to keep his theory fluid, updated, and transparent.
TurnItUpMedia: Ad-Model with a Purpose
April 19, 2009 at 2:39 am | In Marketing, Music Business | Leave a CommentTags: Ad, Advertisement, Catalog, Credit, Digital Music, DSP, It, Media, model, Music, Turn, TurnItUpMedia, Up
I could play the cynic and tell you there’s yet another digital music retailer out there that won’t make it. I could tell you that because it’s an ad-based model it’s doomed from the start. I could tell you that consumers have found a home at iTunes and Amazon, but the truth is that we never really know what is or isn’t going to work. TurnItUpMedia.com has a new twist to the ad model and this is the time to test everything.
TurnItUpMedia has three things going for it.
- Targeted Advertising: You choose the ad you want to watch from a selection of ad screenshots. The selection of ads presented to the consumer is based on certain interests, preferences, and demographic information selected in the account registration process.
- Rewards: Each ad watched accumulates credits. Credits can be redeemed for music. Credits can also be purchased.
- Breadth of Catalog: All major label content available.
Give it a spin. Be sure to leave your feedback here.
Q1 2009 – Media Industry Shrinkage Recap
April 17, 2009 at 2:37 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: 2009, Downsizing, Echo, Electronics, Layoff, Media, Music, Passalong Networks, Q1
According to this TechCrunch graph, the loss of jobs in media and electronics seems to be slowing, but a large number of layoffs comes standard with a new calendar year in a down economy. Looking forward, Q2 doesn’t offer much relief, and has already claimed 2 major music industry victims (Passalong Networks and Echo).
Highlighted media companies who experienced layoffs in Q1 2009:
Jan 8: Dell – 1900
Jan 14: Google – 100
Jan 17: Circuit City – 34,000
Jan 20: Warner Brothers – 800
Jan 20: Clear Channel – 1850
Jan 21: Bose – 1000
Jan 22: Microsoft – 5000
Jan 22: Digg – 7
Jan 31: eBaum’s World – 13
Feb 20: Best Buy – 250
March 11: Sony Pictures – 350
March 25: iMeem – 6
March 26: Google – 200
March 26: Amazon – 210
Edited Keynote – Bad News for Music Marketers
March 25, 2009 at 4:21 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: albums, Borrow and Burn, CD, consumer, Digital Download, Digital Marketing, Digital Music Forum, File Sharing, illegal, Keynote, legal, Music, Music Business, p2p, Radio, Tracks
Some insight from the consumer research front.
The “Price” of Customer Acquisition
November 4, 2008 at 4:20 am | In Music Business | Leave a CommentTags: acquisition, aggressive, albums, Amazon, AmazonMP3, audio, consumer, consumers, customer, digital, download, iTunes, Marketing, MP3, Music, Newbies, price, Rookies, songs, sticky, store, Walmart, Walmart.com
Customer Acquisition…For this excercise, there are 3 kinds of digital consumers:
1. Rookies: Consumers who have never purchased a digital download
2. Veterens(2 types): Experienced Digital Consumers.
_______a) Loyalists: Consumers that value a specific brand of music service and are not easily intrigued by cheaper prices, additional service features, or an alternate, higher quality end product. They are comfortable with the way they already consume music and find value in the brand they have already chosen such as Image, Usability, Convenience, Security, etc.
_______b) Experimentalists: These consumers are crafty and have no existing brand loyalty. Price carries a significant amount of weight in their decision but other factors are an issue such as interoperability, selection, and freedom.
So let’s say you want to start a successful digital music store. There’s only a finite number of customers and you need to motivate them quickly in order to stay afloat, so you prioritize your attack it in this order:
Experimentalists => Rookies => Loyalist
How do you separate them? Price.
Customer Acquisition via Price – This automatically aligns your consumers to the desired priority above and here’s why:
Experimentalists are first because they are proactive about new ideas and new processes. They are already acclimated to what you are asking them to do so you don’t have to teach them. They see the value in what you are offering before they begin and are willing to experiment for that reward (a cheaper price). Experimentalists are also great because their pioneer efforts hardly ever go unnoticed.
…and that’s where you get the Rookies. They want what the Experimentalists are blabbing on and on about, and while they would have never gone down that road on their own, they now have a partner in crime and proof that someone else survived the journey before them. Sure, you may get a few Rookies by chance, but the Experimentalists make great teachers and offer a support structure for them that is crucial to success.
Loyalists? – How do you get the loyalists? Doubt…and this takes time.
You won’t win Loyalists over immediately because they are wrapped very tight in their brand security blanket, but they’re smart. They’ve been around a while – hence the term “veteran” and at one point in time, they used to be “Experimentalists”. They hold tightly to their belief that what they have been doing is best and take great pride in their methods, but the Rookies and Experimentalists continue to plant that seed of doubt with every successful transaction and in every conversation about music.
Rookie, “Oh, I can’t believe how easy that was…and cheap”
Experimentalists, “I know, and the price and quality is so much better than ___”
Once you win over a few Loyalists, then you have yourself a battle. One Loyalist can convert a multitude of others because they know what it would take to convert one of them.
Want to Fail quickly? – create a bad customer experience for any of these consumers. Experimentalists are experienced shoppers and are not going to vouch for your service without good reason. Rookies are newbies for a reason and any misstep will send them back to buying physical CDs or to your competition where they can find tried and true security. Any misstep with a Loyalist will just reinforce his faithfulness to his current system.
______________________________________________
This is exactly what AmazonMP3 and Walmart.com are doing right now, and eating a ton of costs in the name of customer acquisition. Releasing new records (Keane and Snow Patrol) at huge discounts is a great first step in getting the Rookies and the Experimentalists to try it, but it has to be a first step of many.
PRICE_is only the first step, and by itself, it doesn’t create brand loyalty or “sticky” consumers. Both of these companies have a huge online footprint and a broad product selection that is unmatched by most, but when it comes to digital music, they have a long way to go. They must followup their aggressive pricing with a competitive service and brand identity. It is expensive to play offense, and deep pockets are essential, but it’s going to take much more than that. It will be interesting to see how well they execute the next phase of their attack.
Quote – Digital Media Digest
September 28, 2008 at 6:56 pm | In ...And I Quote | Leave a CommentTags: Digest, digital, Industry, Media, Music, Quote
“Just surviving the storm isn’t good enough. We must build a better ship.”
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
