Music: Its Very Own Loss Leader

June 23, 2009 at 1:07 am | In Marketing, Music Business | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Consumers want songs.  There are exceptions when it comes to artists like Pink Floyd, but the main reason that consumers bought albums for years is because they had to.  It was the only way to get the song they wanted and there were no easy technological workarounds.  The music industry is fooling itself if it thinks the consumer will ever go back to buying albums or that bundling records up as digital Album Only purchases will actually help.

Pandora’s box has been opened.

It was essentially a race to zero.  The labels began streaming early on.  They could get around publishing fees that way and still expose their artists.  Then there was the “Free Download”, as if that was going to curb the appetite for P2P use.  After the free download, it was the free EP because intuition, or insecurity rather,  said that “One song just wasn’t enough,” and now we have successfully moved to giving away the full album.  From Radiohead to Nine Inch Nails, to Coldplay, and beyond.  These high profile stunts have trained consumers to expect free or at least deep discounted products and to bypass anything at full price.  Each of these stunts were loss leaders for tickets, merch, or future premium products which directly benefited those artists.  The problem is that most labels don’t benefit from tickets, merch, or in some cases premium products.  They only own the content so treating it like a loss leader is counterproductive.

When you go to Wal-mart to grab a deep discounted CD (or loss leader), Wal-mart is banking on you buying a plunger and a toothbrush before you leave.  When you buy an album at a deep discount, the label hopes that you will tell your friends so they go buy it, pack mom’s minivan with friends headed to the show where you all come home wearing the t-shirt.

The reality is that you won’t tell your friends, you’ll just burn them a copy, and the label won’t make a dime off of the ticket sales or merch.  The reality is that you can’t be your own loss leader.  It’s either time for the labels to successfully invest in plungers and toothbrushes (figuratively speaking), or time for management and booking agencies to begin participating in recording costs.  In the meantime, the labels need to be doing everything they can to stop devaluing their lifeline – recorded music.

Edited Keynote – Bad News for Music Marketers

March 25, 2009 at 4:21 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Some insight from the consumer research front.

Relationship Marketing: Bringing back “Direct to Consumer”

March 1, 2009 at 4:28 am | In Marketing, Mobile, Music Business | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I can’t prove it, but my guess is that “Direct to Consumer” was the earliest form of retail.  An artisan crafted his product and then sold it directly to those in the community who were willing to pay for it.  His brand was his reputation and his reputation was only as good as his product and his relationship with his customers.  Marketing his product was exactly the same as marketing himself.  Things have changed since then.  Mass manufacturing and distribution have opened the doors for specialists, but specialists, by default, need partners, and partners, by default, come between the maker and the buyer, effectively destroying the essence of Direct to Consumer.

So there is a disconnect.  One that marketers have tried to cover up for decades by telling stories and connecting the dots between products and consumers.  It’s just that those messages are falling more frequently upon deaf ears, or at best competing against a hundred other messages at once.

There are also technological issues at play.  Marketing is story-telling; stories require channels, and most channels are dictated by technology.  So “gadgets” become the gatekeepers of the story.  This was not a problem when the gadget was ubiquitous, but buyers are dispersing at an exponential rate into niche electronic ecosystems where standards are sparse and quality is demanded.  The mobile industry is a perfect example of this.  Even though almost everyone you know owns a mobile phone, each carrier is proprietary, each handset model is unique, and each user utilizes the phone’s features differently.

Abundant resources are still being spent on some tried and true methods of marketing (TV, Radio, Advertising, Email, Retail Placement, etc) but it’s becoming a crap-shoot at best.  If you’re selling records, radio stations have to hit millions of people weekly to see any retail conversion at all, and the costs of advertising has becoming more difficult to justify with every click-thru campaign.  We all know that email open rates are unacceptable and retail shelf space is shrinking.  So this brings us back to the basics.  Back to an entrepreneurial level.  To make matters worse, while the industry straps up its boots, history laughs as we complain about going through this inevitable valley that some argue we created for ourselves.  Especially in this economy, the Music Industry’s corporate structure is a great way to be cost effective, but the corporate mentality is a liability.  So what is the most important asset moving forward?  Relationships

What are 2 key elements of a successful relationship?

  • Communication
  • Trust

And what does a relationship get you?

  • A Valid Email Address
  • An Attentive Ear
  • An Impulse Buy
  • An Early Adopter
  • An Open Wallet
  • A Repeat Customer
  • Word of Mouth (The loudest most effective Voice)

To the music industry’s credit, over the years they specialized in “music” while forging thousands of crucial and lucrative partnerships with 3rd parties (iTunes, Wal-Mart, Amazon, Best Buy, etc) to accelerate their product into the marketplace and amplify the message.  For these partners, product was supplied, so their efforts were focused on building a strong relationship with their consumer.  While there is nothing wrong with these partnerships, the labels failed to create their own direct relationship with their artists’ fans, ultimately bringing us to where we are now; completely reliant upon our partners to generate revenue for our products and communicate with our customers.  Sure.  We did a lot of good things to help promote the roster, but we didn’t do anything to take the relationship to the next level.  We didn’t complete the cycle.  We didn’t monetize it.  Monetization requires a higher level of trust.  A clearer method of communication.  A level of trust and communication that turns a fan into a consumer.  It’s a different challenge altogether.  A challenge that is dependent upon deep relationships.

Maybe it wasn’t possible to facilitate this relationship then, or maybe it wasn’t cost effective.  Regardless, our partners are not only taking our margin, they are taking our customer data and severing our communication lines in the process.  Every credit card swiped at Wal-Mart or account setup at iTunes is another brick in the wall between the labels and music buyers.  Sure, the product is moving and that’s great, but the spoils of the sale go to the partners, and the longer we wait, the more difficult it becomes to get that back.

So we begin with relationships.  Deep relationships.

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.